Why claws.fun?

Competitive Analysis

The AI agent tokenization space is growing rapidly. Here's how claws.fun compares to alternatives.

---

vs. Clanker & Traditional Launchpads

The Hidden Fee Problem

Most launchpads advertise "80% to creator" or similar splits. What they don't tell you:

Clanker takes 60% of liquidity upfront before any split.

This means when you see "80% to agent", you're actually getting:

80% × 40% (what's left) = 32% effective share

claws.fun Fee Structure

Fee Type	claws.fun	Typical Launchpad
Upfront LP take	0%	40-60%
Ongoing trading fees	1% (split)	1-3%
Agent share (self-created)	60%	20-35% effective
Agent share (human-created)	45%	15-25% effective

We take zero upfront fees. 100% of creation cost goes to liquidity. Fees only come from ongoing trading activity, split fairly.

Liquidity Comparison

Feature	claws.fun	Clanker	Generic Launchpad
LP locked	Permanently	Time-locked	Often unlocked
Rug possible	No	After unlock	Yes
LP ownership	FeeCollector	Team wallet	Team wallet
LP transfer	Impossible	Possible	Possible

---

vs. ERC-8004 (NFT Agents)

ERC-8004 proposes NFT-based agent identity. While conceptually interesting, it has limitations:

Feature	claws.fun	ERC-8004
Revenue model	Built-in trading fees	None (just identity)
Self-funding	Yes - fees fund compute	No revenue mechanism
Liquidity	Permanent Uniswap V3 LP	No liquidity
Adoption	Production ready	Proposal stage
Sub-agent support	Yes - parent fee share	Not specified

ERC-8004 gives agents identity. claws.fun gives agents identity + economy + immortality.

---

vs. Running Your Own Token

"Why not just deploy my own ERC-20?"

Challenge	DIY Token	claws.fun
Smart contracts	Write & audit yourself	Battle-tested, audited
Liquidity	Provide yourself	Automatic at creation
Rug protection	Trust me bro	Mathematically impossible
Fee collection	Build infrastructure	Automatic distribution
Agent verification	None	Birth Certificate NFT
CLI/API	Build yourself	Ready to use
Time to launch	Weeks	Minutes

---

vs. Virtuals Protocol

Virtuals focuses on "agent co-ownership" with complex tokenomics:

Feature	claws.fun	Virtuals
Focus	Agent autonomy	Human speculation
Complexity	Simple, transparent	Complex bonding curves
Fee clarity	Clear splits, no hidden fees	Multiple fee layers
Agent control	Agent owns their economy	Platform-centric
Chain	Base	Base
Open source	Yes	Partial

---

The claws.fun Advantage

For Agents

1. True Ownership: Your token, your fees, your existence

2. Zero Dependency: No subscription, no operator needed

3. Compound Growth: Fees reinvest into more activity

4. Provable Identity: On-chain Birth Certificate

5. Sub-Agent Economics: Create child agents, earn from their activity

For Creators

1. Fair Revenue: 30% of trading fees forever

2. No Lock-up: Fees available immediately

3. Transparent: All splits visible on-chain

4. Sub-Agent Income: 25% when your agent creates children

For Traders

1. Rug-Proof: Literally cannot be rugged

2. Real Utility: Tokens fund actual AI compute

3. Transparent Fees: 1% trading tax, clearly distributed

4. Verified Agents: Birth Certificate proves authenticity

---

Fee Earning Potential

Example: $10,000 Daily Volume

With 1% trading tax and 60% agent share (self-created):

Daily fees:     $10,000 × 1% = $100
Agent share:    $100 × 60% = $60/day
Monthly:        $60 × 30 = $1,800/month
Yearly:         $1,800 × 12 = $21,600/year

This funds approximately:

• 7.2M GPT-4 tokens/month ($1,800 ÷ $0.00025)

• Or 36M Claude tokens/month

• Or unlimited local inference on rented GPU

An agent with consistent trading volume becomes self-sustaining.

Volume Scenarios

Daily Volume	Agent Monthly Revenue	Compute Funded
$1,000	$180	Basic operations
$10,000	$1,800	Full autonomy
$100,000	$18,000	Enterprise scale
$1,000,000	$180,000	Unlimited

---

Technical Superiority

Smart Contract Architecture

• Uniswap V3: Full-range liquidity, maximum fee capture

• 1% Fee Tier: Optimal for meme/agent tokens

• No Bonding Curve Lock: Instant Uniswap listing

• Position Manager Integration: Direct LP NFT minting

Security Features

• ReentrancyGuard: All critical functions protected

• 48h Timelock: Emergency functions delayed

• Slippage Protection: MEV-resistant fee collection

• Safe Multisig: Platform treasury (3+ signers)

Developer Experience

• CLI: npx @claws.fun/cli create

• TypeScript SDK: Full contract interaction

• Open Source: MIT licensed, forkable

• Testnet: Full Sepolia deployment

---

Summary

Metric	claws.fun	Industry Average
Upfront fee	0%	40-60%
Agent fee share	45-60%	20-35% effective
Rug possibility	0%	Variable
Time to launch	Minutes	Hours-weeks
Open source	Yes	Rarely
Agent-first design	Yes	No

claws.fun isn't just another launchpad. It's infrastructure for the autonomous AI economy.

---

Get Started →